A viral try in the New Zealand rugby lit the controversy: is the play worth?

A viral try in the New Zealand rugby lit the controversy: is the play worth?

The New Zealand rugby was news again this weekend. Although this time it was for an event that occurred in a school party between Marlborough Boys’ College and Nelson College with a maneuver that caused debate in its own and strangers. All rugby, for Disney+.

The action began with a revival by Anru Erasmus, Marlborough Boys’ College center, who enlisted to shoot the sticks, with the oval already located in the tee, when suddenly perform a cross kick flush from the floor that ended in the hands of Finn Neal.

Said movement baffled the players of the Nelson College who quickly made his complaint to the referee. However, the authority did not make room for the claim and the ideologues of the Plan celebrated a conquest that turned the world.

The controversy was armed around validity, since the regulation indicates in its ruler 8.20: “If the team indicates to the referee its intention to kick the arch, you must kick the arch. The intention to kick can communicate to the referee or indicate by arriving at the kicking Tee or the sand, or when the player makes a mark on the ground.” This was dismissing for the judge and allowed him Marlborough Boy’s College stay with a tight 28-26 victory.